A press trip can give a journalist access to people, places and information that would otherwise be difficult to obtain. It also raises a question that deserves a clear answer: who is paying, and what does that mean for the reporting?
In this article, originally published in 2016, I considered examples from Dutch media. The Financieele Dagblad had explained that IBM funded a trip but had no influence over the article. NRC described a journalist travelling at the invitation of the Drents Museum.
We had also helped organise a client’s trip to Seattle that year. In that case, the journalist paid for travel and accommodation to maintain independence.
A press trip should serve a relevant story
The examples produced very different coverage. IBM’s trip led to a substantial article about the company. The Drents Museum’s visit to Guatemala formed part of the communications around a Maya exhibition and attracted interest from national, regional and specialist media.
The Seattle visit belonged to a broader story about international aviation. In each case, the question was larger than whether the destination was attractive: did the trip help the journalist report something relevant to the audience?
Organisations look for a mix of channels to reach people. Advertising and their own content may be part of that mix, but independent editorial interest has a different role. A museum, for example, can offer access to expertise and context that supports a wider cultural story.
Be clear about arrangements
I do not see a problem with a journalist taking part in a relevant trip when the publication has made an informed decision about the arrangements. Transparency helps readers understand the circumstances.
In the museum example, NRC subsequently examined its own description of the trip. The discussion distinguished travelling “at the invitation of” an organisation from clearly stating that it had also paid the costs. That distinction matters because readers should not have to infer the financial arrangement.
For an agency, the practical lesson is to make the terms clear in advance and respect the publication’s requirements. Participation should not be treated as a promise of favourable coverage.
Access is useful; editorial judgement remains independent
Travel takes time and money. A newsroom therefore needs to decide whether a visit will provide information or insight that justifies the commitment.
That decision belongs to the publication. So do the questions asked, the angle chosen and the final editorial judgement. Trust in journalism depends on readers being able to distinguish reporting from a message controlled by the organisation being covered.
The original article also discussed newsroom practices such as reviewing coverage and changing reporters’ areas of responsibility. These were examples of how publications could consider the relationships that develop over time, rather than assuming that familiarity was always harmless.
Where a PR agency adds value
A PR agency can contribute by understanding who covers which subjects and by offering useful knowledge about the market. That may include explaining developments, arranging access to specialists and helping journalists identify relevant questions.
For a press event or trip, the programme should fit the publication’s interests and conditions. If a newsroom chooses to pay its own costs, that is a decision to accommodate.
Good media relations are built on useful information and respect for each side’s role. The aim is to make a worthwhile story possible while leaving the journalist free to report it.
Stella
More news ›